Lightning rounds #26: How we follow the medical literature

We discuss our approach to keeping up with research, learn about new studies, interpret them, and some general thoughts on how to apply new literature to our practice.

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!

TIRBO #30: Experience is lying to you

When the lessons of memory, clinical experience, and time may be more deceptive than instructive.

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!

Episode 57: Hyponatremia with Paul Adams

We tackle the knotty dilemma of diagnosing and treating hyponatremia, with Dr. Paul Adams, a dual-trained nephrologist and intensivist at the University of Kentucky.

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!

Takeaway lessons

  1. Start by asking whether the hyponatremia needs to be corrected emergently, as well as its cause. Instability means correct it emergently, and instability usually manifests as seizure.
  2. While hyponatremia is often categorized by volume status, volume status is a tricky determination with ample gray area and room for overlap. It’s more useful to approach hyponatremia by asking whether ADH is active or not.
  3. If urine osm is >300, ADH is definitely present to some extent.
  4. The hypovolemic and/or low solute patient will be fixed with crystalloid, although they are at risk of overcorrection. Overcorrection almost always occurs due to autodiuresis, not from exogenously administered salt.
  5. A high urine sodium implies lack of sodium reabsorption by the kidneys, more consistent with diuresis (thiazides) or ATN (failure of absorptive mechanisms). Low urine sodium is a broader differential, e.g. most of the appropriate-ADH hyponatremias.
  6. While there is overlap between hypovolemia (often acute) and low solute intake (often more subacute/chronic), they are distinct syndromes. They can be differentiated by the urine osm: both urine sodiums will be low, but urine osm will be low only in the low solute patient (because they simply aren’t taking osms in). The hypovolemic is at greater risk of overcorrection as well.
  7. It’s often impossible to determine how acute hyponatremia is, so generally assume chronic and correct slowly.
  8. Overcorrection from acute hypovolemia will be mediated by dilute polyuria, so a good monitoring strategy may be to simply send serial urine osms, particularly if polyuria occurs. Have a low threshold to clamp them with DDAVP if it occurs.
  9. When risk for osmotic demyelination is highest (risks: longer duration of hyponatremia, low solute intakes like malnourishment and alcoholism, and lower sodium), consider prophylactically clamping with DDAVP.
  10. Use small boluses (100 ml) over about ten minutes to correct hyponatremia-induced seizures and repeat as needed until seizures stop. Trend labs but don’t stop until symptoms resolve, or you correct by 5 mEq. Most cases of true hyponatremia-induced seizure or severe encephalopathy will require around 500 ml total. Other concentrations could probably be used but are subject to logistical issues and are really just manipulating the amount of diluent volume.
  11. Theoretically, inducing hyponatremia in neurologic patients could create the same risk as rapidly correcting hyponatremia, but data is limited and from a bedside perspective, this doesn’t generally seem to cause demyelination.
  12. For SIADH, a loop diuretic can be useful, but the mainstay is fluid restriction. The right amount of restriction depends on free water clearance; a cirrhotic who only produces 500 ml of free water a day should theoretically be restricted below this intake (which is not easy).
  13. Vaptans have a limited role outside specific use-cases like bridging to transplant (although not for liver – they may cause hepatotoxicity).
  14. Confusing pictures (eg SIADH vs hypovolemia vs CSW) can be clarified by a sodium challenge – bolus a liter of normal saline and see what they do with the salt. Remember that if you give fluid with a lower osmolality than the urine osmolality – common in SIADH – you’ll actually dilute them and lower their sodium further.
  15. Hypervolemic hyponatremia, e.g. from cirrhosis or heart failure, is generally correctable only by managing the underlying disease.
  16. Truly chronic hyponatremia usually won’t cause acute symptoms like encephalopathy, but are associated with various more subtle medical complications like osteoporosis.
  17. Oral salt like salt tablets are generally not a huge help for SIADH; salt handling is separate and inadequate sodium is not the issue. You can force some salt into them by simultaneously fluid restriction (although this is horrible for their thirst), but once they leave a controlled setting and can compensate with unmonitored water intake they’ll return to their set point.
  18. Fludrocortisone takes a while to act (it’s a steroid) and probably has a limited role in hyponatremia. Remember it works on the kidneys and has no effect if urine is not made.

Resources

TIRBO #29: Understanding blood transfusion

A review of the basics of blood donation, storage, typing, screening, matching, and transfusion.

Transfusion medicine series at Critical Concepts

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!

Lightning rounds #25: FailureFest! (Why we’re bad and so are you)

A candid discussion of our flaws, mistakes, weaknesses, and errors, and a look at why it’s important to reflect on these things in medicine, acknowledge them, and try to improve.

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!

TIRBO #28: How I set PEEP

A review of the methods of PEEP setting, including stress index, PV loops, esophageal manometry, and PEEP tables, and finally my preferred method of driving pressure trials.

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!

Episode 56: Resuscitation psychology with Dan Dworkis

Discussing the psychology of emergency response, team dynamics, and debriefing with Dan Dworkis, MD, PhD, FACEP. He’s the Chief Medical Officer at the Mission Critical Team Institute, a board-certified emergency physician, and an assistant professor of emergency medicine at the Keck School of Medicine of USC where he works at LAC+USC. He performed his emergency medicine residency with Harvard Medical School at the Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency at Massachusetts General Hospital / Brigham Health, and holds an MD and PhD in molecular medicine from the Boston University School of Medicine. He is the founder of The Emergency Mind Project, and the author of The Emergency Mind: Wiring Your Brain for Performance Under Pressure

The Emergency Mind Project: www.emergencymind.com

The Emergency Mind Book: bit.ly/emindbook

The Emergency Mind Podcast: www.emergencymind.com/podcast

The Mission Critical Team Institute: www.missioncti.com

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!

Takeaway lessons

  1. Intact teams train together, while swarm teams are ad hoc and must perform without prior preparation. Many healthcare teams are somewhere in between, a “jello” team. How to effectively swarm and run such a team is one of the common challenges in a hospital-based emergency.
  2. Intentionally limit information input when needed. In the initial stages of resuscitation and stabilization, much of the medical history and other details may not be pertinent.
  3. Identify your role when you walk into the code and ask who’s in charge. If there’s no response, identify that it’s you. Ask if there are pads on, if there’s IV access, the last rhythm, and who’s doing compressions next. These are step zero in your management. If someone is already in charge, ask how you can help.
  4. Usually there’s no need to use names, which are tough to remember in the heat of the moment. Roles are adequate. In the long run you can seek to build those relationships further.
  5. Nurse leaders can be a great way to offload the provider leading a code and tackle logistics like delegating tasks to the best person to handle them.
  6. Cross-disciplinary simulation training builds relationships between staff, but also stress-tests procedures and even equipment setups.
  7. If you’re not in a leadership position, lead change like a flock of starlings. When you change direction and nudge the handful of people nearest to you, you’ll create a wave of change that can propagate outwards. What can you do on this shift to make you and your team 1% better? Ask yourself and others, what did you learn from this case? What surprised you, what did you learn? What can we improve next time? Small, subtle changes like this build over time.
  8. Seemingly complex decision pathways can often be simplified by considering what you can do and what it depends on. Bifurcations that don’t change what you do at this juncture can be eliminated.
  9. Don’t waste suffering.
  10. Initial steps in debriefing is to make sure the team is physically and psychologically okay, and ensure the team and equipment are prepared for the next patient.
  11. Next, take two minutes with anyone who can spare the time to discuss what we learned from the patient. What went well, what went better? The room is always smarter than you individually; solicit opinions from everyone.
  12. When numerous conflicting demands are present, optimize your performance by finding ways to streamline and protocolize decisions to reduce the number that need to be contemplated in the heat of the moment. Anything high yield, low risk, just make the decision ahead of time to do them without thought.

TIRBO #27: The halo effect

An important cognitive bias in medicine, and how the COVID pandemic has shown us that generalizing the assumption of competence is a treacherous pitfall.

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!

Lightning rounds #24: Getting into leadership roles

After our recent episodes on publishing papers and giving talks, we close off with a review of leadership and academic rank: sitting on committees, educational roles, faculty appointments, and more.

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!

TIRBO #26: RadioPEEP discordance

On today’s TIRBO: A sinister pitfall that may lead you to injuring lungs and worsening outcomes.

Find us on Patreon here!

Buy your merch here!